The philosophical arguments for and against using extraordinary measures, such as torture and extra-territorial targeted killings in the context of the war against contemporary terrorism

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-02T03:22:25Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-02T03:22:25Z
dc.date.issued 2016-07-02
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9965-31-764-4
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.enu.kz:8080/handle/data/13107
dc.description.abstract Some people refer to targeted killings of suspected terrorists as extrajudicial executions, while others claim they are legitimate acts of war. In this report I will discuss both advantages and disadvantages of using extraordinary measures like torture and extra-territorial targeted killings in the context of the war against contemporary terrorism. ru_RU
dc.language.iso other ru_RU
dc.relation.ispartofseries UDC;327.8
dc.title The philosophical arguments for and against using extraordinary measures, such as torture and extra-territorial targeted killings in the context of the war against contemporary terrorism ru_RU
dc.type Article ru_RU


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account