Репозиторий Dspace

Development of the innovation system infrastructure of Kazakhstan in the context of the knowledge-intensive economy

Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.contributor.author Sabirova, Rysty
dc.contributor.author Korgan, Bibinur
dc.contributor.author Adiyetova, Elmira
dc.contributor.author Auyezova, Karlygash
dc.contributor.author Yerniyazova, Zhanat
dc.contributor.author Kanatova, Ainur
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-18T05:12:58Z
dc.date.available 2025-12-18T05:12:58Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.citation Sabirova R, Korgan B, Adiyetova E, Auyezova K, Yerniyazova Zh, Kanatova A. Development of the innovation system infrastructure of Kazakhstan in the context of the knowledge-intensive economy. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):244–256. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.24fj4 ru
dc.identifier.issn 24158038
dc.identifier.other DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.24fj4
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.enu.kz/handle/enu/28846
dc.description.abstract Relevance. The modern conditions of post-industrialism in the sphere of economic relations are influenced by some factors, in particular, institutional changes and the challenges of globalization. In turn, this is characterized by a new format that has an organizational and institutional focus. Purpose. This research aims to elucidate the distinctions between the terms “institute” and “institution” within the context of the innovation economy. Methodology. The study draws on theoretical and methodological foundations rooted in the national innovation system, synthesizing insights from foreign and domestic scholarship. Employing a system-structural and functional approach Results. The research unveils a sequential hierarchy of institutional definitions, revealing inherent differences between “institute” and “institution”. It proposes a classification of institutions based on eight criteria, offering a nuanced understanding of institutional dynamics within the innovation economy. Notably, it introduces the concept of temporary and permanent institutions, elucidating their roles in periods of systemic modernization and legislative evolution. Conclusions. The study underscores the necessity for clarity in conceptualizing institutional terms, particularly within the realm of institutionalism. ru
dc.language.iso en ru
dc.publisher Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series “Physics” ru
dc.relation.ispartofseries Issue 55, 244–256;
dc.subject features of the economic system ru
dc.subject innovations in the Republic of Kazakhstan ru
dc.subject institutionalism ru
dc.subject globalization ru
dc.subject post-industrial information society ru
dc.title Development of the innovation system infrastructure of Kazakhstan in the context of the knowledge-intensive economy ru
dc.type Article ru


Файлы в этом документе

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

Показать сокращенную информацию

Поиск в DSpace


Просмотр

Моя учетная запись