Репозиторий Евразийского национального университета имени Л.Н. Гумилева
Репозиторий Евразийского национального университета имени Л.Н. Гумилева
Репозиторий Евразийского национального университета имени Л.Н. Гумилева
Просмотр элемента 
  •   Главная
  • Научные статьи
  • 01. Публикации в изданиях зарубежных стран
  • Engineering
  • Просмотр элемента
  •   Главная
  • Научные статьи
  • 01. Публикации в изданиях зарубежных стран
  • Engineering
  • Просмотр элемента
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Bearing Capacity of Precast Concrete Joint Micropile Foundations in Embedded Layers: Predictions from Dynamic and Static Load Tests according to ASTM Standards

Thumbnail
Автор
Omarov, Abdulla
Sarsembayeva, Assel
Zhussupbekov, Askar
Nurgozhina, Malika
Tleulenova, Gulshat
Yeleussinova, Akmaral
Isakulov, Baizak
Дата
2024
Редактор
Infrastructures
ISSN
2412-3811
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-identifier-citation
Omarov, A.; Sarsembayeva, A.; Zhussupbekov, A.; Nurgozhina, M.; Tleulenova, G.; Yeleussinova, A.; Isakulov, B. Bearing Capacity of Precast Concrete Joint Micropile Foundations in Embedded Layers: Predictions from Dynamic and Static Load Tests according to ASTM Standards. Infrastructures 2024, 9, 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ infrastructures9070104
Аннотации
In this paper, joint precast piles with a cross-section of 400 × 400 mm and a pin-joined connection were considered, and their interaction with the soil of Western Kazakhstan has been analyzed. The following methods were used: assessment of the bearing capacity using the static compression load test (SCLT by ASTM) method, interpretation of the field test data, and the dynamic loading test (DLT) method for driving precast concrete joint piles, including Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA by ASTM) and Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) methods. According to the results, the composite piles tested by the PDA (by ASTM) method differ by 15 percent compared to the static load method, while the difference between the dynamic DLT (by ASTM) method and the static load (by ASTM) method was only 7 percent. So, according to the results, the alternative dynamic method DLT (by ASTM) is very effective and more accurate compared to other existing methods.
URI
http://repository.enu.kz/handle/enu/30021
Открыть
BEARIN~1.PDF (24.68Mb)
Collections
  • Engineering[651]
Показать полную информацию
CORE Recommender

Евразийский национальный университет имени Л.Н. Гумилева | Научная библиотека | Контакты
YM
Научная библиотека | Контакты
 

Просмотр

Весь DSpaceСообщества и коллекцииДата публикацииАвторыНазванияТематикаЭта коллекцияДата публикацииАвторыНазванияТематика

Моя учетная запись

ВойтиРегистрация

Евразийский национальный университет имени Л.Н. Гумилева | Научная библиотека | Контакты
YM
Научная библиотека | Контакты