THE ROLE OF CONSTRUCTION HISTORY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF KAZAKHSTAN'S AND KYRGYZSTAN'S HISTORY

Abstract

The construction of history is a complex and multifaceted process that involves the interpretation and analysis of historical events and their impact on society. This article presents a comparative analysis of the construction of history in the American and Russian scientific fields. The article explores the similarities and differences in the approaches and methodologies used by scholars in both countries to construct and interpret historical narratives. The article begins by discussing the historical context of the construction of history in the United States and Russia. In the United States, the construction of history is heavily influenced by the country's founding principles of democracy and individualism. American historians often focus on the contributions of individuals to historical events and the impact of those events on society. In Russia, the construction of history has been shaped by a history of authoritarian rule, which has led to a focus on the role of the state in shaping historical events.