Показать сокращенную информацию
| dc.contributor.author | Myrzakulov, Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Donmez, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Koussour, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muminov, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ostemir, D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rayimbaev, J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-11T07:07:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-11T07:07:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1811-1165 | |
| dc.identifier.other | doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14112-1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.enu.kz/handle/enu/30085 | |
| dc.description.abstract | We are experiencing a golden age of experimental cosmology, with exact and accurate observations being used to constrain various gravitational theories like never before. Alongside these advancements, energy conditions play a crucial theoretical role in evaluating and refining new proposals in gravitational physics. We investigate the energy conditions (WEC, NEC, DEC, and SEC) for two f (Q, Lm) gravity models using the FLRW metric in a flat geometry. Model 1, f (Q, Lm) = −αQ + 2Lm + β, features linear parameter dependence, satisfying most energy conditions while selectively violating the SEC to explain cosmic acceleration. The EoS parameter transitions between quintessence, a cosmological constant, and phantom energy, depending on α and β. Model 2, f (Q, Lm) = −αQ +λ(2Lm)2 +β, introduces nonlinearities, ensuring stronger SEC violations and capturing complex dynamics like dark energy transitions. While Model 1 excels in simplicity, Model 2’s robustness makes it ideal for accelerated expansion scenarios, highlighting the potential of f (Q, Lm) gravity in explaining cosmic phenomena. | ru |
| dc.language.iso | en | ru |
| dc.publisher | Eurasian Physical Journal C | ru |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 85:376; | |
| dc.title | Energy conditions in f( Q, Lm) gravity | ru |
| dc.type | Article | ru |