Репозиторий Евразийского национального университета имени Л.Н. Гумилева
Репозиторий Евразийского национального университета имени Л.Н. Гумилева
Репозиторий Евразийского национального университета имени Л.Н. Гумилева
Просмотр элемента 
  •   Главная
  • Научные статьи
  • 01. Публикации в изданиях зарубежных стран
  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Просмотр элемента
  •   Главная
  • Научные статьи
  • 01. Публикации в изданиях зарубежных стран
  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Просмотр элемента
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Development of the innovation system infrastructure of Kazakhstan in the context of the knowledge-intensive economy

Thumbnail
Автор
Sabirova, Rysty
Korgan, Bibinur
Adiyetova, Elmira
Auyezova, Karlygash
Yerniyazova, Zhanat
Kanatova, Ainur
Дата
2024
Редактор
Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series “Physics”
ISSN
2786-6688
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-identifier-citation
Sabirova R, Korgan B, Adiyetova E, Auyezova K, Yerniyazova Zh, Kanatova A. Development of the innovation system infrastructure of Kazakhstan in the context of the knowledge-intensive economy. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):244–256. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.24fj4
Аннотации
Relevance. The modern conditions of post-industrialism in the sphere of economic relations are influenced by some factors, in particular, institutional changes and the challenges of globalization. In turn, this is characterized by a new format that has an organizational and institutional focus. Purpose. This research aims to elucidate the distinctions between the terms “institute” and “institution” within the context of the innovation economy. Methodology. The study draws on theoretical and methodological foundations rooted in the national innovation system, synthesizing insights from foreign and domestic scholarship. Employing a system-structural and functional approach Results. The research unveils a sequential hierarchy of institutional definitions, revealing inherent differences between “institute” and “institution”. It proposes a classification of institutions based on eight criteria, offering a nuanced understanding of institutional dynamics within the innovation economy. Notably, it introduces the concept of temporary and permanent institutions, elucidating their roles in periods of systemic modernization and legislative evolution. Conclusions. The study underscores the necessity for clarity in conceptualizing institutional terms, particularly within the realm of institutionalism.
URI
http://repository.enu.kz/handle/enu/30738
Открыть
244-256_Sabirova et al.pdf (431.5Kb)
Collections
  • Physics and Astronomy[794]
Показать полную информацию
CORE Recommender

Евразийский национальный университет имени Л.Н. Гумилева | Научная библиотека | Контакты
Яндекс.Метрика
Научная библиотека | Контакты
 

Просмотр

Весь DSpaceСообщества и коллекцииДата публикацииАвторыНазванияТематикаЭта коллекцияДата публикацииАвторыНазванияТематика

Моя учетная запись

ВойтиРегистрация

Евразийский национальный университет имени Л.Н. Гумилева | Научная библиотека | Контакты
Яндекс.Метрика
Научная библиотека | Контакты